Proponents of a ballot initiative to scrap partisan primaries are asking the Arizona Supreme Court to set deadlines for filing legal challenges against propositions.
The request comes after the state Supreme Court ruled challenges can come after ballots start printing.
The group Make Elections Fair, which has backed Proposition 140, argued that legal challenges against ballot measures should only come before ballots start printing.
The court has allowed a legal challenge to continue despite that ballot deadline having passed in August, giving the foes a chance to argue the number of signatures fell short. If it were to succeed, any votes the measure got in November would not be counted.
An attorney for Make Elections Fair says that would disenfranchise voters.
The suit was sent back to a trial judge holding a hearing next week on the measure’s signatures.
Right now, candidates for partisan elections face off in a primary. Then each party's top vote-getters appear on the November ballot.
Prop. 140 would replace that with an open primary where all candidates from all parties compete against each other. And all voters, regardless of party affiliation, can cast a ballot.
It would then allow the top two vote-getters to face off in the general election, regardless of party designation. But it also would permit the Legislature to let up to five candidates advance to the general election, with a system of ranked-choice voting to ultimately decide who wins.
Make Elections Fair submitted about 575,000 signatures. That was winnowed down after checks by state and county election officials to 409,474, still more than the 383,923 needed to qualify for the ballot.
Foes, however, contend about 40,000 of those signatures are duplicates.
-
A lawyer for Maricopa County Attorney Rachell Mitchell told a judge that the Trump-aligned law firm representing Recorder Justin Heap in an ongoing lawsuit against the Board of Supervisors shouldn’t be allowed to stay on the case. -
The dust has settled from November’s elections. But not for one former City Council member who found herself on the ballot earlier than expected. -
The Arizona Democratic Party is going to court to block the renaming of the No Labels Party, admitting in its legal filings that it believes the name change could harm its own candidates. -
One state lawmaker thinks she’s found a way to convince Arizona voters to approve the first pay raise for legislators since 1998: enforceable term limits. -
An attorney for the Arizona Independent Party says he has served state officials with a notice of claim alleging that independent candidates had to file six to eight times more signatures to make it to the ballot than candidates form either of the major parties.
