A federal judge in Arizona denied Mark Meadows’ request to move his fake electors case out to a federal court.
Meadows, who was chief of staff to former President Donald Trump, was one of 18 people indicted by an Arizona grand jury for allegedly scheming to undermine President Biden’s victory over Trump in 2020.
The Associated Press reported that Meadows asked a federal judge to move the case to U.S. District Court, arguing his actions were taken when he was a federal official working as Trump’s chief of staff and that he has immunity under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says federal law trumps state law.
In a ruling issued on Monday, U.S. District Court Judge John Tuchi found that federal law allows suits against federal officials to be removed from state courts if the officer can “establish that the prosecution is for or relating to an act under color of office.”
However, Tuchi ruled Meadows’ case will remain in the county court, because the charges he faces in Arizona have little to do with the official duties of the president’s chief of staff.
“Instead, the State has indicted Mr. Meadows for allegedly orchestrating and participating in an illegal electioneering scheme,” according to the ruling. “Few, if any, of the State’s factual allegations even resemble the secretarial duties that Mr. Meadows maintains are the subject of the indictment.”
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge recently heard arguments by attorneys for Meadows and other defendants in the Arizona fake electors case, who argued the case should be dismissed under a state law that prohibits litigation designed to stifle a political opponent’s constitutional rights.
Judge Bruce Cohen has not yet issued a ruling on that request to dismiss the case.
-
There's nothing unconstitutional about having a state Court of Appeals deciding cases where not everyone from every county gets to vote on every judge, the Arizona Supreme Court has concluded.
-
A new lawsuit filed Tuesday seeks to void the name change of the Arizona Independent Party, arguing it will cause widespread voter confusion.
-
A veteran legislator is seeking to alter the law so that county supervisors never have to worry that they’re being asked to certify election returns — even when they question the accuracy.
-
The Citizen Clean Elections Commission is calling on Secretary of State Adrian Fontes to reverse a decision allowing one of the state’s newest political parties to rebrand itself, arguing the party’s new name will cause mass voter confusion and logistical problems for election officials.
-
Attorney General Kris Mayes is going to continue to pursue the 11 Republicans who claimed to be the state's legally elected electors despite the actual results of the 2020 presidential race.