The state Court of Appeals ruled last week that Arizonans have a right to know who is spending money to influence elections.
The judges ruled unanimously in favor of a proposition from 2022 that reveals the names of those who spend money on state and local races.
The judges rejected arguments from the Arizona Free Enterprise Club and the Center for Arizona Policy that Prop 211 interferes with their rights of privacy.
Writing for the court, appellate Judge Jennifer Campbell said the voter initiative serves an important government interest because it helps curb corruption.
Campbell said it ensures voters know exactly who is trying to sway elections for those who support their positions.
Prop. 211 says any organization that spends $25,000 on local races, or double that in statewide races, has to reveal the names of donors who spent at least $5,000.
The challengers say they will appeal.
-
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge is in the process of dismissing the lawsuit against a voter-approved proposition to extend a half-cent sales tax for in-county transportation projects. -
Immigration has often been a political football. Elvia Díaz says some Democrats are trying to score points with the issue as they prepare for another Trump administration. -
More than 34,000 people voted in the 2024 election at one of ASU’s campus polling places, and the undergraduate student government at ASU says it played a significant role in that student turnout. -
The Democratic Pima County Sheriff has narrowly won his re-election bid, according to recount results released on Friday morning. -
A federal judge has tossed out a claim by the head of the Arizona Republican Party and two GOP allies that there are at least 500,000, and possibly 1.27 million, people on voter registration rolls who shouldn't be there.
