Two Republicans seeking the southern Arizona congressional seat that was held by the late Congressman Raúl Grijalva faced off in a debate Thursday in Phoenix.
Daniel Butierez and Jorge Rivas went head to head while a third candidate, Jimmy Rodriguez, pulled out at the last minute. Butierez ran unsuccessfully for the same seat last year.
Both candidates said they support President Donald Trump’s mass deportations. But they differed on the approach.
“I don't think law enforcement should be going into our schools or our churches. I believe they should be sanctuary areas," Butierez said.
Rivas disagrees.
“We cannot pick and choose where we enforce the laws, we cannot pick and choose when we enforce the laws. If we do that, then we become a banana republic.," Rivas said.
But both said they have no problem deporting migrants, even those who fear for their safety. Rivas, who fled El Salvador in the 1980s, says it’s not the responsibility of the U.S to ensure every country treats its citizens well.
Both candidates also say they support Trump’s tariffs and a House-passed bill that would make deep cuts to Medicaid and other programs.
The primary is set for July 15. The general election will be in September.
-
Arizona Republican lawmakers want to redraw the state’s legislative and congressional districts early. Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego believes that would be a boon to Democrats. -
An effort to repeal Arizona law that allows for recreational marijuana dispensaries won’t go before voters this November. -
The U.S. Supreme Court last week struck down a provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, in a case out of Louisiana. -
Republican gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs says he and Kari Lake are “very different people,” despite his opponent’s claims. -
Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren will face off against a slew of candidates in the race for the tribe’s presidency in November — 15 challengers to be exact. Nygren took the tribe by storm when he beat out incumbent Jonathan Nez four years ago. But since, he has faced mounting scrutiny over allegations of ethics violations and misuse of public funds.
