KJZZ is a service of Rio Salado College,
and Maricopa Community Colleges

Copyright © 2026 KJZZ/Rio Salado College/MCCCD
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Judge: Trump-aligned lawyer can represent Maricopa County recorder in election power struggle

Arizona state Rep. Justin Heap at a rally for former President Donald Trump on Aug. 23, 2024, at Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale.
Gage Skidmore/CC by 2.0
Arizona state Rep. Justin Heap at a rally for former President Donald Trump on Aug. 23, 2024, at Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale.

Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell has no authority to block a Trump-aligned law firm from representing Recorder Justin Heap in his ongoing legal fight with the board of supervisors over control of the county’s elections, a judge ruled.

After Heap sued the board last summer, Mitchell sent a cease-and-desist letter to America First Legal, the rightwing nonprofit co-founded by White House advisor Stephen Miller that is representing the Recorder.

“This letter is to inform you that I am the recorder’s attorney, and you do not represent the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office or Recorder Heap in his official capacity,” Mitchell wrote. “I am, therefore, demanding that you cease and desist from any further representation of the Recorder.”

Mitchell eventually joined the ongoing lawsuit and asked a judge to disqualify America First Legal and attorney James K. Rogers. Mitchell argued that when the county attorney is unable to represent county officials due to a conflict of interest — such as in the ongoing lawsuit between Heap and the board — she has sole authority to appoint legal representation for them.

But Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott Blaney ruled that is not the case.

“The plain language of the statute governing the County Attorney’s powers and duties does not empower her with the authority she claims in this lawsuit,” Blaney found.

In the cease-and-desist letter, Mitchell cited the state law outlining the county attorney’s duties. She also cited several court cases dealing with county officials who attempted to hire their own outside counsel “holding that the Board of Supervisors ‘has no authority to employ private counsel to advise the Board and other county officers or employees,’” referring to a 1978 Arizona Supreme Court decision.

Blaney rejected that argument, finding Mitchell’s claims were not backed up by the state law describing a county attorney’s powers.

Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell speaks at a press conference on Oct. 22, 2025.
Maricopa County Attorney's Office
/
Facebook
Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell speaks at a press conference on Oct. 22, 2025.

That law details a broad range of duties reserved for county attorneys, including defending the county against lawsuits and providing legal opinions to county officers, but says nothing about appointing outside counsel for the board or recorder in the event of a conflict.

“The authority that the County Attorney asserts in this case is simply not listed in the statute among the very specific, detailed list of her statutory powers, and this Court may not read into the law what the Legislature deliberately left out,” Blaney wrote.

In a statement on social media, Heap praised the ruling.

“This important decision is consistent with the law and firmly establishes a fundamental principle: elected officials have the right to retain legal counsel of their own choosing and cannot be compelled to accept representation selected by the County Attorney,” he wrote.

An attorney for Mitchell filed a request asking the Arizona Supreme Court to consider an appeal of the ruling.

More election news

Wayne Schutsky is a senior field correspondent covering Arizona politics on KJZZ. He has over a decade of experience as a journalist reporting on local communities in Arizona and the state Capitol.