Arizona’s Senate leader changed his mind about trying to redraw the state's congressional district lines.
In April, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Louisiana v. Callais that sections of the Voting Rights Act are unconstitutional, making it illegal to take race into consideration in redistricting.
Following that decision, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen (R-Gilbert) said he and other GOP legislators planned to file a lawsuit this year to require the commission tasked with drawing Arizona’s lines to redraw them.
Petersen said Monday that’s not the plan anymore.
“Their sentiment — the current redistricting commission — was that the lines would be very similar so a lawsuit probably wouldn’t make much sense,” Petersen said.
Since the Supreme Court decision came down on April 29, a handful of states have redistricted and will use new maps in this year’s midterm general election.
Those states — Alabama, Louisiana, Florida and Tennessee — are different from Arizona in a key way.
In those four states, the legislatures are tasked with drawing congressional maps, and the legislatures are controlled by Republicans.
In Arizona, the Legislature is also controlled by Republicans, but the maps are drawn by the Independent Redistricting Commission, which is balanced between Republicans, Democrats and an independent.
The IRC last met in 2021 and isn’t set to meet again to redraw Arizona’s lines until 2031.
Petersen said his change of mind is not because Republicans realized the new districts could be drawn in a way that actually favors Democrats more.
The idea that redistricting could work in Democrats’ favor is something Sen. Ruben Gallego believes. But University of Arizona political science professor Chad Westerland told KJZZ neither major political party could know for sure how the new maps would shake out.
-
Find everything you need to know about elections in Arizona and Maricopa County from KJZZ's politics team.
-
Arizona Congressman and gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs led an unsuccessful effort this week to cap the amount of U.S. Supreme Court justices at nine, which he said would prevent future Democratic leaders from appointing more liberal justices.
-
A longtime Arizona Department of Child Safety official backed up claims by the agency’s former director, who alleged a state group home operator and Democratic donor offered to help him keep his job in exchange for a rate increase that is at the center of pay-to-play allegations levied against Gov. Katie Hobbs’ administration.
-
A whistleblower has raised concerns that the new rules developed by the U.S. Postal Service on mail-in voting are problematic, saying the process to come up with them was “secretive, rushed, chaotic and fundamentally flawed.”
-
The Arizona Attorney General’s Office is now investigating three political candidates who face allegations their campaigns falsified records to obtain millions of dollars in public funding.