A pair of rights groups trying to stop the closure of accountability offices at the Department of Homeland Security are asking a federal court to step in.
DHS closed three accountability offices earlier this year — including those that monitor conditions in detention centers and investigate alleged human rights abuses.
Advocacy groups sued to stop that process last month. Now, they’re asking the federal court to preserve what’s left of the offices while the case progresses.
Lilian Serrano is director of the Southern Border Communities Coalition — one of the groups behind the suit.
“We are hearing from partners in the immigrant rights movement that some of them are either already filing or considering continuing to file all the violations that we’re seeing on the ground,” she said.
Serrano says they worry those complaints will continue to pile up and go unanswered.
Her group has learned that staff at DHS’s Civil Rights and Civil Liberties office — one of the accountability bodies being shuttered — are slated to be terminated this month. They’re asking the judge to issue a preliminary injunction to put a halt to the firings.
-
Amid public sector and SNAP cuts along with higher gas prices and lessening affordability here, The Show checked in with Carla Vargas Jasa, president and CEO of Valley of the Sun United Way. -
The declines were felt across the Mountain West. In Idaho, SNAP participation fell nearly 8%. Nevada saw a drop of more than 14%. In Arizona, participation fell by nearly 34%. New Mexico saw a decrease of about 6%, while Wyoming dropped by more than 11%. -
Arizona has now dropped more than 450,000 people from the SNAP program since federal changes went into effect last July. That includes 196,000 children no longer receiving benefits. -
A report from a consumer advocacy organization warns that hundreds of hospitals across the country are at risk of closure or reduced services — including eight in Arizona. -
There’ve been efforts over the years in Arizona to transfer ownership — and control — of federal land to the state. Oftentimes, that’s due at least in part to lawmakers’ not being happy with federal plans for that land.
