Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes says a recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court threatens to erode constitutional protections and revive the racial profiling issues caused by Arizona’s SB 1070.
The high court’s 6-3 ruling sides with the Trump administration in a case over whether "roving" ICE patrols in Los Angeles are constitutional.
Immigrant rights groups and individuals who filed suit argued the Trump administration was systematically targeting brown-skinned people and that people were detained indiscriminately and denied lawyers.
Supreme Court justices ruled to upend a lower court order that temporarily blocked the patrols. Though the court's decision did not offer an explanation into the ruling, a separate write-up from conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued federal agents can use ethnicity and language as factors to determine reasonable suspicion to question a person's immigration status.
"To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court’s case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a concurring “relevant factor” when considered along with other salient factors," Kavanaugh wrote.
In a statement, Mayes said the new ruling threatens to revive a dark past in Arizona.
"Without explanation, the majority of the Supreme Court has allowed federal agents in the Los Angeles area to continue to stop and detain people, many of whom may be citizens or legal residents, based on factors like language or appearance that supposedly support the inference that those people may be here illegally," Mayes said.
"When Arizona passed SB 1070 15 years ago, we saw a drastic increase in instances of racial profiling, regardless of an individuals’ immigration status. The Supreme Court’s decision today threatens to revive that dark past."
Mayes also argued the lower order, which was upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, remains binding law within Western states within that court's jurisdiction, including Arizona.
"Because no majority of Justices on the Supreme Court stated their reasons for granting a stay, we do not know whether they disagreed with the 9th Circuit on the merits or merely as to procedural issues such as standing or the scope of relief," Mayes said.
"As a result, the 9th Circuit’s decision on the merits remains precedential law. Federal law enforcement officers should follow that ruling and ensure that any stops are based on individualized suspicion about the person in question, not sweeping generalizations."
-
Voting rights groups are training Arizona residents to become constitutional observers on Election Day. Around 80 people filed into a hotel in Tucson Saturday for an event organized by LUCHA. -
Researchers used bystander video and news reports to put together a database of incidents where pepper spray, rubber bullets and other measures were used by law enforcement — resulting in injuries ranging from cuts and burns, to traumatic brain injuries. -
A congressionally approved federal program has for years provided funding for a handful of legal groups representing immigrant kids in Arizona and elsewhere. The Trump administration moved to end the program last spring. -
Arizona Democrats are demanding answers from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security after several cases of measles were confirmed among people in ICE custody in the state. -
The Kino Border Initiative and Loyola University Chicago School of Law filed a report to the United Nations, arguing conditions at U.S. immigration detention centers violate international human rights standards — including those prohibiting torture.
