The Arizona Supreme Court has cleared the way to let voters decide in November if they want to allow judges to serve nearly lifetime terms.
The Thursday order rejected arguments from challengers that Proposition 137 illegally amends two separate provisions in the state Constitution.
Judges in the state are currently appointed by the governor, then stand for retention elections every four to six years depending on whether it's a Supreme Court, appellate or trial judge.
Prop. 137 would get rid of those elections in most cases, leaving judges on the bench potentially until the mandatory retirement age of 70.
Challengers sued to block it, because it would also allow members of the Legislature to investigate complaints state lawmakers have against judges.
The high court unanimously ruled they are sufficiently related to each other to be a single question on the ballot.
-
Find everything you need to know about elections in Arizona and Maricopa County from KJZZ's politics team. -
A proposal sent to the November ballot by Republican lawmakers to undercut Arizona’s teachers unions has drawn the ire of police and firefighters across the state, who believe the measure would also harm their labor organizations. -
Voters will get the chance to add guardrails to the state’s universal private school voucher program in November — probably. -
The U.S. Department of Justice is sending “elections monitors” to Arizona and five other states. -
The Arizona Supreme Court sided with Republican County Recorder Justin Heap this week, dealing a blow to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, which now must give Heap the resources he says his office needs to conduct upcoming elections.
