KJZZ is a service of Rio Salado College,
and Maricopa Community Colleges

Copyright © 2025 KJZZ/Rio Salado College/MCCCD
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Charlie Kirk shooting videos are pervasive. Experts say platforms should take more responsibility

Within moments of the assassination of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, the graphic videos of his murder rippled across social media. The videos were so pervasive many users saw it whether they wanted to or not.

Some experts say social media platforms need to take more responsibility for this type of content.

Two days after Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University, the state’s governor, Spencer Cox, called social media “a cancer.”

“We are not wired as human beings, biologically, historically, we have not evolved in a way that we are capable of processing those types of violent imagery,” Cox said.

He says the video reminds him of JFK’s assassination in the 1960s. And while President John F. Kennedy’s murder was also filmed, it took more than a decade for the public to see the infamous, uncensored reel in full, according to the Sixth Floor Museum. For Kirk, and other recorded violence in the social media age, it’s taking seconds.

Within moments of Kirk being shot Sept. 10, video captured by attendees was being circulated on social media sites like Facebook, X, TikTok and Instagram.

Professor Hazel Kwon is with the Media Information, Data and Society Lab at Arizona State University.

“Traditionally we tend to say,’ OK, news media, journalism and media, they are exerting the gatekeeping power. They decide what to cover or not,” Kwon said. “I think that notion needs to be revisited and rewired.”

She says in the social media age, with many people having a camera and access to a publishing platform at the click of a button, gatekeeping can no longer be just about selective censorship. And social media platforms have a unique role to play by taking control of the algorithm.

“If we exchange the term between content moderation and gatekeeping, nowadays gatekeeping of news content, or whatever the information content, it’s not just about making a judgement over the content, it is about controlling the flow over information,” Kwon said.

She says while social media platforms have content moderators, there is the missing piece of proactive infrastructure.

“I think the question really is: do they have that capability for forecasting?” Kwon said. “For example, journalism newsrooms have the connection with the local police department, for example, so when we report the news, we already sort of know that this event is coming up. So people are ready to monitor and report the situation.”

The Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority owns the stadium in Glendale. An authority spokesperson says event contracts, done by a separate stadium manager, are confidential.

Professor Shawn Walker, who teaches in the social data science program at ASU, agrees that social media platforms need to have a bigger role in content moderation.

He says especially when moderators may be working against a built-in algorithm designed to quickly spread engaging content.

“Of course we’re engaging with this content because this is a horrific event,” Walker said. “These videos are horrific, watching this violence is horrific, and also saying, ‘Well, this might be who did this; this might be what happened; did you hear this thing this happened; did you hear this might be a conspiracy theory; this is something else.’”

And with the algorithm doing what it's designed to do, users were left with little choice.

“The video itself was hard to avoid, that's how pervasive this video was,” Walker said. “So we think again about the algorithms that run these platforms, that choose which content you have in your feeds and what you see front and center and so everybody starts watching these videos and then because everybody is watching these videos, people that would not normally see that content, that gets pushed into their feeds.”

Merchandise for sale outside the Charlie Kirk memorial in Glendale on Sept. 21, 2025.
Chelsey Heath/KJZZ
Merchandise for sale outside the Charlie Kirk memorial in Glendale on Sept. 21, 2025.

He says social media companies need to create environments that support getting accurate and updated information out, and marking trusted sources, especially during crisis events.

“This is an emergent investigation, this is a crisis, this is a traumatic event, but it’s also emergent and we don’t have the information of what happened, how, when,” Walker said. “That’s starting to slowly emerge. And as a part of an investigation, there's always a, ‘We think this happened. Nope — that actually wasn’t what happened; this is what happened.’ That is a part of this process.”

And if that sounds like the role of journalism, Kwon says that journalists should rethink their modern gatekeeping role, as well.

“They have a reduced power in gatekeeping content, but they have an ever expanding importance of playing a role of watchdog of the gatekeeping processes,” Kwon said.

Walker says verification takes time, and in the modern era of social media, breaking news is bypassing the traditional gatekeepers and being fed to an algorithm designed to produce engagement that, in the end, gets reported to investors and generates revenue.

More Charlie Kirk news

Jill Ryan joined KJZZ in 2020 as a morning reporter, and she is currently a field correspondent and Morning Edition producer.