KJZZ is a service of Rio Salado College,
and Maricopa Community Colleges

Copyright © 2026 KJZZ/Rio Salado College/MCCCD
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Here are the 10 measures lawmakers sent to the Arizona ballot in November

Orange, white and blue sign with arrow pointing to Ballot Drop Box seen through fence with cars behind it
Kayla Mae Jackson
/
Cronkite News
A ballot drop box sign in Phoenix on Tuesday, March 19, 2024.

Arizonans will get to decide whether to add voter ID requirements to state elections, keep transgender children out of peer’s bathrooms and more in November, as lawmakers passed a series of last minute ballot measures.

In addition to voter referendums — however many can gather enough valid signatures to qualify for the ballot — Arizonans will decide the fate of 10 other measures sent to the ballot the last two years by Republican lawmakers.

Several of those measures were added at the very end of the legislative session, which wrapped up for the year at 4:45 am on Saturday morning, allowing lawmakers to officially hit the campaign trail.

Proposed changes to elections

The Arizona Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit against Secretary of State Adrian Fontes that argued he tried to trick voters into rejecting a Republican election reform measure that will appear on the November ballot.
Arizonans will get a chance to decide on a package of proposed changes in election law on everything from who can spend money to influence races to a requirement that all voters — including those who cast ballots by mail — will have to provide identification.
The conservative legal group accused Fontes of trying to mislead voters about Proposition 144, a Republican election-reform ballot measure.
A law firm aligned with President Donald Trump is suing Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes over how he plans to describe a Republican election reform proposal on November general election ballots.
A Maricopa County judge upheld an election reform proposal sent to the ballot by Republican lawmakers that critics claim could be used to undermine mail-in voting.

One proposal, passed on party lines, would require voters to show ID before voting.

Democrats questioned how people who vote by mail are supposed to do that.

Under current state law, Arizonans must show ID to register to vote in state and local races and must show ID at the polls on election day if they vote in person, but not if they use drop boxes or vote by mail.

“Would they slip a copy of their driver’s license into their ballot? Would they write their social security number inside? I mean it’s really not spelled out. It’s like very bad homework. This is a rushed attempt and a very thinly veiled attempt to eliminate mail in voting,” Sen. Lauren Kuby (D-Tempe) told her colleagues.

Republicans argued the measure, HCR 2001, will increase transparency in elections and improve security. They’re calling the measure the “Fast Election Results Act.”

“We should be citizens in order to vote in our elections,” Rep. Rachel Keshel (R-Tucson) said. “We should have valid ID in order to vote in our elections. Our vote is sacred.”

An earlier version of the measure would have sped up election results by moving up the deadline to end early voting and prohibiting votes from being cast after the polls close on election day.

However, since those provisions have been removed from the bill, it’s not clear how it would make results faster.

Transgender legislation

Proponents of a ballot measure that would ban transgender students from using bathrooms that don’t match their biological sex want Arizona’s secretary of state to investigate a website opposing the measure.

Republican lawmakers have pushed bills for the last few years to restrict transgender students from using bathrooms, pronouns and locker rooms that don’t match their biological sex.

Hobbs has consistently struck that legislation down, although GOP lawmakers did pass a bill banning transgender girls from playing girls sports when Republican Gov. Doug Ducey was in office.

On Friday, Republicans added HCR 2003 — a ballot measure requiring athletic associations to separate sports based on sex and bans transgender athletes from using bathrooms, locker rooms or other private spaces that don’t align with their biological sex.

Democrats called the legislation discriminatory and bigoted

“I want every kid that’s watching and that is going to see the hurtful things that come out as this heads out to the ballot to know how loved you are and to know how valuable you are,” Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-Phoenix) said.

But Republicans said the measure is about protecting girls in sports.

“Republicans are obsessed with fairness and safety. … A transgender female has all of the physical benefits of God-given testosterone. They have an advantage,” Sen. John Kavanagh (R-Fountain Hills) said.

Traffic cameras

For years, Sen. Wendy Rogers (R-Flagstaff) has attempted to ban the cameras used by some Arizona cities to bust drivers who exceed the speed limit or run red lights only to have those bills vetoed by Hobbs.

Last year, the governor said she vetoed the bill because it hampers the ability of law enforcement to keep streets safe.

Now, Arizona voters will get the final say with SCR 1004.

Rogers’ ballot referral would ban photo traffic enforcement systems in Arizona, unless a local government or state agency already has a contract in place for those devices. In that case, the measure would require those municipalities to ask for voter approval to keep using the cameras.

The referral passed both the House and Senate with only Republican votes.

Conflicting ballot measures on school vouchers

A measure proposing major reforms to the Empowerment Scholarship Account program will no longer go to voters after missing the mark on signatures, according to a ruling from the Arizona Supreme Court.
A judge says the summary of Proposition 145 that Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes wrote is illegal.
Republican lawmakers crafted an explanation of a measure to make major reforms in the voucher system in a way that is illegally designed to convince people to vote against it, a trial judge has ruled.
Republican lawmakers are appealing a court ruling, seeking to keep a measure on the ballot that would nullify an effort to put restrictions on the state’s school voucher program.
A Maricopa County judge has removed a so-called “poison pill” measure from the general election ballot that critics called a veiled attempt to undermine a competing school voucher reform initiative.
Voters will get the chance to add guardrails to the state’s universal private school voucher program in November — probably.

A failed attempt at finding a compromise between public school advocates, the teachers’ union and Republican lawmakers triggered a wave of legislative ballot referrals that Democrats criticized as a coordinated attack on public schools.

GOP senators claimed one legislative ballot referral is simply about asking voters to preserve vouchers used by military families. But the legislation also includes specific language intended to void the more stringent reforms backed by public school advocates and teachers.

GOP lawmakers went on to pass two more ballot measures which public school teachers oppose.

A Maricopa County Superior Court Judge deemed a ballot measure that would severely restrict unions is unconstitutional, and can’t stay on the ballot.

HCR 2040 would restrict teachers from engaging in union activity.

Another measure, HCR 2007, would limit the amount of funding schools can use for administrative purposes.

The bill sponsor, Rep. Matt Gress (R-Phoenix) said his legislation ensures money lawmakers send to schools will actually go to teachers and classrooms, not administrative bloat.

“I’m crushed that we will be moving these referrals to the ballot. I do not think our voters deserve to see so many attacks on hardworking people put forward this way,” Sen. Priya Sundareshan (D-Tucson) said of the measures.

Republican state lawmakers made a last-ditch effort to hijack efforts to rein in ESAs on Friday, after a deal with the teacher’s union fell through.

Anti-discrimination

House Speaker Steve Montenegro (R-Goodyear) sponsored a measure to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, sex, color, national origin or ethnicity, which is already illegal.

HCR 2044 bans the state from spending any money on discriminating against individuals as it relates to employment, education or contracts.

The measure targets Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and policies that aim to give minority groups a leg up.

Measures from 2025

Lawmakers also passed three ballot measures in 2025, making the total amount that will be on the ballot this year 10.

One measure from last year would designate drug cartels as terrorist organizations, if approved by voters.

The ballot measure would designate drug cartels that operate across the Southwest border as terrorist organizations at the state level.

Another measure would prohibit the state, and all municipalities, from imposing a mileage-based tax on vehicles.

The Legislature sent a proposal to the ballot that would ask voters to block the state and local governments from excising a mileage-based tax for vehicles. The debate stems from electric vehicle usage.

Lastly, lawmakers added a measure in 2025 which bans municipalities from taxing groceries above 2%.

State lawmakers want to give voters the option to restrict how much cities and towns can tax groceries.

Camryn Sanchez is a senior field correspondent at KJZZ covering everything to do with Arizona politics.
Wayne Schutsky is a senior field correspondent covering Arizona politics on KJZZ. He has over a decade of experience as a journalist reporting on local communities in Arizona and the state Capitol.
Related Content
  • Find everything you need to know about elections in Arizona and Maricopa County from KJZZ's politics team.