KJZZ is a service of Rio Salado College,
and Maricopa Community Colleges

Copyright © 2026 KJZZ/Rio Salado College/MCCCD
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Arizona asylum attorney says U.S. Supreme Court ruling will put her clients in harm's way

Migrants wait outside a building, in a line next to a purple wall
Kendal Blust
/
KJZZ
Migrants wait outside Kino Border Initiative's shelter and soup kitchen in Nogales, Sonora, on Monday, April 12, 2021.

Presidents of both parties have limited the number of people who could apply for asylum at U.S. ports of entry.

Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for the practice to be once again used in Arizona.

The Justice Department convinced a majority of Justices that people stopped by authorities haven’t yet arrived in the country, so immigration agents don’t have to let them apply for asylum.

By a 6-3 vote, the high court ruled that federal law allows the government to stop asylum seekers from physically setting foot in the United States, effectively keeping them from applying for asylum.

In Arizona, the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project represents those fleeing persecution.

“And I think the decision really rubber stamps executive overreach, undermines decades of asylum and congressional intent. And that’s going to put our clients in harm’s way,” said Laura Belous, managing attorney.

Advocates said metering the number of people allowed to seek asylum caused a humanitarian crisis with thousands settled in unsafe shelters to wait their turn.

Homeland Security praised the high court’s ruling, but did not say if the policy will be brought back.

More Immigration News

Matthew Casey has won Public Media Journalists Association and Edward R. Murrow awards since he joined KJZZ as a senior field correspondent in 2015.
Associated Press
The Associated Press is an independent not-for-profit news organization.